|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 16 post(s) |
Gypsio III
Chemikals
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
350
   |
Posted - 2012.09.19 12:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
Current dual-BCS Caracal: 263 DPS kinetic, 210 non-kinetic, with CN to 120 km, 8.4 km/s missiles.
Future triple-BCS Caracal: 252 DPS all damage types with CN to 90 km, 9 km/s missiles.
I'm glad to see the Caracal surviving the deserved HML Drake/Tengu nerf fine. |
Gypsio III
Chemikals
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
350
|
Posted - 2012.09.19 12:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
Removing penalties from active-tanking rigs is fine, but mobility penalties on HP rigs should be retained, and extended to shield rigs. Forcing a choice between mobility and EHP is good design. |
Gypsio III
Chemikals
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
353
|
Posted - 2012.09.19 14:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Garviel Tarrant wrote:Gypsio III wrote:Current dual-BCS Caracal: 263 DPS kinetic, 210 non-kinetic, with CN to 120 km, 8.4 km/s missiles.
Future triple-BCS Caracal: 252 DPS all damage types with CN to 90 km, 9 km/s missiles.
I'm glad to see the Caracal surviving the deserved HML Drake/Tengu nerf fine. Hams + TE/TC's man.. Thats the way to go!
No no no.... HMLs, sitting at range applying four link-Proteus-boosted tracking disruptors. 
Actually that'll work with HAMs too. TDs on everything! |
Gypsio III
Chemikals
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
356
|
Posted - 2012.09.19 16:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
[Caracal, future]
Damage Control II
Ballistic Control System II
Ballistic Control System II
Ballistic Control System II
Experimental 10MN MicroWarpdrive I
Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
Balmer Series Tracking Disruptor I, Optimal Range Disruption Script
Balmer Series Tracking Disruptor I, Optimal Range Disruption Script
Balmer Series Tracking Disruptor I, Optimal Range Disruption Script
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Mjolnir Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Mjolnir Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Mjolnir Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Mjolnir Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Mjolnir Heavy Missile
Medium Warhead Rigor Catalyst I
Medium Warhead Rigor Catalyst I
Medium Ionic Field Projector I
heh. just enough cpu. 50% TDs even without links. |
Gypsio III
Chemikals
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
361
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 10:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Dr Sheng-Ji Yang wrote:What the hell? 300dps and this speed would be far too much. For example the NEW caracal can be happy if it can do 350 dps with HAMs in a really tight fit (2 reactor control unit 2, 2 ballistic control sys) without THAT speed.
Not quite sure what you're saying about future Caracal here, but it will be able to fit HAMs, MWD and LSE with a single ACR, for 396 DPS excluding drones (CN, triple BCS). |
Gypsio III
Chemikals
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
361
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 11:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
Try fewer LSEs and more TDs. |
Gypsio III
Chemikals
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
362
|
Posted - 2012.09.21 13:49:00 -
[7] - Quote
There should be more thought going into the choice of rigs, rather than just HP rigs on everything. Forcing a choice between EHP and mobility is good design, so speed penalties on trimarks should not only be retained but also extended to Extender and Purger rigs. Altering to an agility penalty would probably also work though.
Active-tanking rigs should get no penalty; resist rigs should get either no penalty or a light one, sig radius would probably work. |
Gypsio III
Chemikals
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
362
|
Posted - 2012.09.21 13:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
You are talking about known problems with ASBs, not problems with rig penalties.
ASBs aren't really active tanking mods anyway, they're effectively buffer mods. |
Gypsio III
Chemikals
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
365
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 10:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
Doubling the DPS for ten times the cost sounds pretty standard for Eve. |
|
|
| |
|